Skip to content

Conversation

Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

Urgau and others added 12 commits May 27, 2023 00:16
Only make the use-dot-operator-to-call-method suggestion, but do not
double down and use the recovered type to perform method call
typechecking as it will produce confusing diagnostics on the "fixed"
code.
…cked, r=WaffleLapkin

Uplift `clippy::invalid_utf8_in_unchecked` lint

This PR aims at uplifting the `clippy::invalid_utf8_in_unchecked` lint into two lints.

## `invalid_from_utf8_unchecked`

(deny-by-default)

The `invalid_from_utf8_unchecked` lint checks for calls to `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked` and `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked_mut` with an invalid UTF-8 literal.

### Example

```rust
unsafe {
    std::str::from_utf8_unchecked(b"cl\x82ippy");
}
```

### Explanation

Creating such a `str` would result in undefined behavior as per documentation for `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked` and `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked_mut`.

## `invalid_from_utf8`

(warn-by-default)

The `invalid_from_utf8` lint checks for calls to `std::str::from_utf8` and `std::str::from_utf8_mut` with an invalid UTF-8 literal.

### Example

```rust
std::str::from_utf8(b"ru\x82st");
```

### Explanation

Trying to create such a `str` would always return an error as per documentation for `std::str::from_utf8` and `std::str::from_utf8_mut`.

-----

Mostly followed the instructions for uplifting a clippy lint described here: rust-lang#99696 (review)

```@rustbot``` label: +I-lang-nominated
r? compiler

-----

For Clippy:

changelog: Moves: Uplifted `clippy::invalid_utf8_in_unchecked` into rustc
…lor-9, r=notriddle

Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format

Follow-up of rust-lang#111459.

The `browser-ui-test` update is a fix when converting the alpha value to hex format. More information [here](GuillaumeGomez/browser-UI-test#511).

r? ```@notriddle```
Don't typecheck recovered method call from suggestion

Only make the use-dot-operator-to-call-method suggestion, but do not double down and use the recovered type to perform method call typechecking as it will produce confusing diagnostics relevant for the *fixed* code.

### Code Sample

```rust
struct Client;

impl Client {
    fn post<T: std::ops::Add>(&self, _: T, _: T) {}
}

fn f() {
    let c = Client;
    post(c, ());
}
```

### Before This PR

```
error[[E0277]](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/error_codes/E0277.html): cannot add `()` to `()`
 --> src/lib.rs:9:5
  |
9 |     post(c, ());
  |     ^^^^^^^^^^^ no implementation for `() + ()`
  |
  = help: the trait `Add` is not implemented for `()`
note: required by a bound in `Client::post`
 --> src/lib.rs:4:16
  |
4 |     fn post<T: std::ops::Add>(&self, _: T, _: T) {}
  |                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `Client::post`

error[[E0061]](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/error_codes/E0061.html): this function takes 2 arguments but 1 argument was supplied
 --> src/lib.rs:9:5
  |
9 |     post(c, ());
  |     ^^^^ an argument of type `()` is missing
  |
note: method defined here
 --> src/lib.rs:4:8
  |
4 |     fn post<T: std::ops::Add>(&self, _: T, _: T) {}
  |        ^^^^                   -----  ----  ----
help: provide the argument
  |
9 |     post((), ())(c, ());
  |         ++++++++

error[[E0425]](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/error_codes/E0425.html): cannot find function `post` in this scope
 --> src/lib.rs:9:5
  |
9 |     post(c, ());
  |     ^^^^ not found in this scope
  |
help: use the `.` operator to call the method `post` on `&Client`
  |
9 -     post(c, ());
9 +     c.post(());
  |

Some errors have detailed explanations: E0061, E0277, E0425.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0061`.
```

### After This PR

```
error[E0425]: cannot find function `post` in this scope
 --> tests/ui/typeck/issue-106929.rs:9:5
  |
9 |     post(c, ());
  |     ^^^^ not found in this scope
  |
help: use the `.` operator to call the method `post` on `&Client`
  |
9 -     post(c, ());
9 +     c.post(());
  |

error: aborting due to previous error

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0425`.
```

Fixes rust-lang#106929.
@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 30, 2023
@Noratrieb Noratrieb closed this May 30, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label May 30, 2023
@Noratrieb Noratrieb deleted the rollup-dikulqi branch May 30, 2023 10:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants